Skip to content
About · The Practice

They hired an architect and called him an engineer.

He told them he wasn’t one. They said, “you’re smart — figure it out.” So he took the defense work, reduced it to first principles, and made it work. That instinct — decompose anything until it can be solved — became the method behind everything since.

The practice

E.T.T.S. builds advanced systems through Digi-DNA.

Extra Terrestrial Technology Systems LLC operates through the Digi-DNA brand to design and deploy intelligent systems for the physical world — work that sits at the intersection of architecture, measurement, embedded technology, building environments, software, automation, and applied systems thinking.

Digi-DNA reflects a long-standing conviction: technology should be embedded into the system itself, not treated as an afterthought. The intelligence layer is designed in from the beginning — connecting physical conditions, sensors, interfaces, software, and workflows so they operate as one coordinated environment.

The method

One operating procedure. We call it Sequence.

It isn’t a brand voice — it’s how the work actually gets done, and it has been consistent for twenty-five years.

/01 — DECOMPOSE

Find the irreducible unit

Break the system down to the smallest part that makes it what it is. You cannot improve what you have not reduced.

/02 — DIGITIZE

Capture every variable

Make each variable that governs the system measurable. Not a proxy — the full set of inputs.

/03 — INTEGRATE

Solve at the connections

The value lives in the integrations between units. Solve there, then close the loop with intelligence.

The origin
“You’re smart — figure it out.”

The line that started it was almost a dare. A junior architect, handed engineering he hadn’t been trained for, was told to reason it out himself. The defense work that followed succeeded — and a few years later the same instinct collapsed a 32-operation manufacturing line down to a single operation on a Mori Seiki mill-turn.

That is Sequence, lived: take something over-built, find the one operation that matters, and remove everything that isn’t it.

The throughline

Physics, then design — always carrying the computation in.

One path, one method, across very different rooms: a science foundation, an architecture education that never left the software behind, a decade in precision manufacturing and fabrication, formal study in autonomy and robotics, and finally a practice of his own.

  1. 1992 — 1993 · RIT

    Physics

    The deep-tech root. Physics, assembly, Fortran, C/C++, Unix — low-level systems and early web work before the web was the web. Transferred to architecture in 1993, carrying the computation along.

  2. 1993 — 1997 · Clemson

    Design / Architecture & Planning

    Architecture and planning — with virtual-reality coursework and a role running the campus internet help desk. Design school for someone who never stopped building systems.

  3. 1997 — 2003

    Architecture-as-software

    Inside architecture firms and a design studio: interactive media, UI/UX, object-oriented programming in service of the built environment. An ADDY award along the way. The architect who was also the technologist.

  4. 2003 — 2008 · Laurentide

    Precision manufacturing & fabrication

    Engineering and fabrication for the defense sector — V-hull vehicle structures, a purpose-built plasma cutting table, jig fixturing for the Boeing 787 line, and the 32-to-1 CV-joint redesign. Where systems thinking met metal.

  5. 2013 — 2015 · MIT · TU Munich · Berkeley

    Autonomy, robotics, and AI — formal study

    Underactuated robotics (MIT), autonomous navigation for flying robots (TU Munich), artificial intelligence (Berkeley), aerodynamics and hypersonics. The childhood instinct for building and rebuilding control systems, taken to graduate-level rigor — exactly as the drone and sensing work matured.

  6. 2011 — now · E.T.T.S. / Digi-DNA

    The practice

    From the founding wearable through the sensing platform, drones, and the Kernal orchestration layer. RC cars to drones to reading the body without electrodes — one continuous instinct, now a practice.

Grounding

The engineering is real, and it’s documented.

The autonomy and sensing work isn’t a pivot into a trend — it’s backed by formal study in precisely the fields the platform depends on.

MIT
Underactuated Robotics
2015
TU Munich
Autonomous Navigation for Flying Robots
2014
UC Berkeley
Artificial Intelligence
2014

Build the system behind the outcome.